Consumer Insights; Am I doing the right thing?

“Nice to see, but consider it sold if broken” or “No replacement or return of any items once purchased” used to be standard caveats in many stores a decade ago. I was shocked and surprised to see the ‘no replacement’ warning on the bill recently and started wondering if we have progressed at all with regards to consumer rights and consumerism.

I could not understand the concept of no items can be replaced or returned. This smacks of totalitarian attitude and assumes that the customer is actually more of a “con” sumer.

In that context the kirana store’s attitude used to be and is still a refreshing change. Many a time I have seen products including bags of rice being sent back and the same being replaced.

How does the kirana store owner manage to do it whereas many larger stores are afraid (Yes, afraid!!) to extend this basic customer service?

Simply because the he is a far more astute businessman completely tuned into the basic psyche of a consumer. Almost everyone has experienced the phenomenon called post purchase dissonance. Which basically translates into concern/ worry/ dissatisfaction with regard to the choices made and the product(s) purchased.

The Kirana guy eliminates this by giving the customers a psychological comfort which over a period of time grows into the foundation of his business - the trust of the customer - and therefore a habit to purchase from that store.

Most Corporate Retailers have taken this lesson, but whether it is to heart or is it lip service is something that I leave you to think about. The reason for my ambivalence is, although most of them have a replacement or returns policy, the on-the-ground experience for a customer who wishes to avail this is still not a very pleasant experience.

The usual culprits - internal policies, procedures and paper work ensures that the staff are apprehensive in extending this without any questions asked and in the process make the entire consumer experience most painful.

Lastly, if I don’t have the confidence that the retailer would support me in my moment of post purchase dissonance or even a genuine quality problem, would my loyalty be with that retailer?

Very doubtful.

Delivering a memorable customer experience

This article is the next in the series on how to implement the customer experience element of basic Retail model, in the Indian context. This was published on Sept 17, 2009.

The faith and trust a customer places in a retailer is a function of his shopping experience. Unless a Retailer works towards creating a memorable experience, the chances of success is very slim. There are many ways to achieve this objective. The Kirana stores use a one on one personalised approach which cannot be duplicated by Corporate Retail. So, how should Corporate Retail manage this crucial element?

To read the whole article, please click on this link -

- Delivering a memorable customer experience

Some views about Corporate Retail

I have been and will continue to be a passionate advocate of corporate retail which enables a chain of stores. Simply because this would enable too many good things if done well; Like supply chain, development of food processing industry, employment opportunities (Most Important), better tax realisation for the government, so on and so forth.

But then I can’t be blind to the handicaps and shortcomings of this segment too.

Although I have written about the cost disparity between corporate and conventional retail, the fact remains that most conventional shop keepers have learnt fast and got their act together; whether it is in terms of self service or packed groceries! Or even adopting technology in terms of billing systems, etc as reported in Times of India recently.

While corporate retail seems to be floundering! Why?

By now countless seminars, training sessions and perhaps even blogs like mine have created a humongous information base. Media, as always, has capitalised on this craze and one gets to see a large array of magazines about retailing.

Plus there are a handful of experienced retail professionals in India who have not only pioneered Corporate Retail, but have extensive experience spanning across formats and life cycle stages.
So, why is corporate retail struggling against all the conventional ones - be it the ubiquitous kaka ka dukaan or naadar kadai or some of the larger ones.

I believe it is because of the fact that a basic principle of retail has been forgotten. This is called as “Leadership by dirtying one’s hands”. This is my terminology and this translates into leading from the front.

I recall a very poignant memory. During one of my earlier employment stints, I was with Pepsi Foods. I happened to go route riding and was faced with an irate store owner who demanded immediate resolution of an outstanding issue. After polite counter points (Please read as Bull Shit, in CAPS) failed, I had no other choice but to call the office and take inputs/ seek help from the sales head. The secretary (Obviously well trained) promptly said that the head of sales was in a meeting. While I was relaying this message to the shop owner, he grabbed the phone and said in basic Tamil – Amma, naangalla veyillae vitthathaan, aangae AC le meeting nadakum. This means – Only if we sell in this sweltering heat, can you guys afford to conduct meetings in AC rooms. Needless to say, the concerned person came on line and the issue was resolved.

There is an old Tamil folk lore of a King who had a bell which could be rung by any aggrieved citizen and once, even a cow rang it and got justice.

In a country so rich with consumer rights, why is no corporate retail chain displaying any consumer orientation?

Apart from other things like cost structure, is this crucial consumer orientation the core/ key factor which tilts the scale in favour of conventional stores?

Reaching out and creating a connect with customers is a simple thing and there are enough and more simple, cost effective ways of creating this connect. However, at a macro level the organisation needs to be aligned and honest to delivering this customer delight. That by itself would diminish the usual corporate games and enable people to work towards consumer delight.

Is Corporate Retail listening? Or rather, are they interested?

Can someone explain the math to me?

News paper advertising charges are nowadays on a per square centimetre basis. The advertisement shown is actually of a fairly small size. However, repeating the message, using modified language seems like colossal waste. Or is it that this retailer thinks that the customers are so dense that they need the message dinned into them in two different ways?

A simple way to make this communication effective would have been to increase the font sizes and make it more eye catching.

Installation on the same day; Did it build the brand?

Expectations created and not met are not only dangerous, but deadly for any retail brand!

Consider the example of an advertisement I shared some time ago wherein a powerful pain point for consumers had been leveraged to hopefully build credibility and thereby creating a competitive differential for that retail brand.

Now let me share the other side of the story.

When I was recounting this during the MBA class I teach retailing for, several hands went up wanting to refute and share a counter point of view. For most, the claim in the advertisement was downright hilarious as their real time experience in getting the air conditioner installed took anywhere from a week to almost a month.

Is it any wonder that the retailer has realised the folly of a hollow promise and has dropped that claim/ promise from the subsequent communication. Still, they could not desist from a somewhat similar claim of providing installation on Sunday, if purchased on that day! Let’s see, if this one lives up to the expectations being created.

As Mr. Ogilvy said; the customer is not a moron. The sooner retailers realise it and constantly keep it in mind, the better for the retail brand.

Why social networking sites are not being used by Indian Retail?

Twitter, the micro blogging site is gaining strength each passing day. Yet, I don’t see this being leveraged by any of the Indian Retail Chains, leave alone the Indian businesses. This has the potential to become a great sounding board for customers as also an information source for retailers. I would leverage this medium in myriad ways, starting from the following –

• Create a followers base of all regular/ loyal customers and tweet all promotions and offers details.
• Leverage this medium to increase the followers’ base by offering some exclusive powerful offers only to twitter followers with a unique alphanumeric code. They need to show this tweet at the cash-till wherein this is captured for audit purposes and the promotion is extended to the customer.
• Leverage the power of retweet to increase reach and the number of loyal customers.
  Create a database of potential part time employees who can be sent tweets in times of special promotions where extra man power is required.
• Conversely, customers can tweet their feedback/ suggestions and complaints which can be directed to the respective department with a date and time stamp to track closure and measure reaction time.

Sceptics would debate about the penetration and awareness of such applications amongst the Indian shopper, especially the India Housewife. All I can say is that there are lots of net savvy housewives and individuals in India today and these initiatives will only create further impetus for others to take to this. I recall a news report way back in 2007 which talked about how housewives are increasingly doing online trading in shares! I rest my case.

Similar to Twitter is Facebook. Why can’t Indian Retail leverage it the way ZooZoo’s of Vodafone did? Create a group, invite fans as also invite feedback and suggestions. Create interesting messages to be shares and propagated. Simple things like wall papers, screen savers of interesting advertisements, automatic updates.

In fact several consumer review sites like mouthshut.com are being ignored by retail marketers, assuming people are even aware of the same! This site has close to 90 listings each for one of the corporate chains and similarly significant number of reviews about others. I wonder if this is being even seen or tracked by anyone and reverted to? At least is someone aware that such a thing is there on the net and I am talking about only one such site. Word of mouth advertising is the most powerful toll for a retailer and ignoring such public feedback is not going to help the lakhs and crores of marketing spends being indulged by these retailers.

In summary, there seems to be a serious dearth of creativity in Indian Retail with regard to maximising the marketing efforts and budgets available. What has been done since the mid 90’s in terms of product and price communications, using red and yellow seems to be a clichéd, repetitive pattern. I for one do not believe in knocking the old, tried and tested methods. But I also do not recommend being blind to new developments and not exploring every such new opportunities, especially low cost and high impact options.

Is there a fear psychosis?

The above picture was published in today’s “The Hindu” newspaper and shows the Fort St. George which was where the East India Company built a fort and formed a settlement. In a year’s time they had built a warehouse and a stockade.

Retail or trading as it used to be in those days has truly been the building blocks of an empire. Even today Retail in most developed countries is the largest employment provider and a significant contributor to the economy. In India too this might be the case, excepting that no one knows the true picture because of the fragmented nature of this sector.

The above picture prompted another thought. Is there a strong fear psychosis behind not allowing international retailers into India? Is there concern about a repeat of East India Company? The fact of the matter is that retail as a sector would definitely be a strong component of any economy. The government needs to think along the lines of allowing retail FDI while retaining strong control and curbs and not be blind to its benefits because of what happened centuries ago.

Lastly, I am not too familiar with the retail FDI rules in the UK but from what I know there has been no space for Retail players from other countries apart from a few exceptions where international operators have taken over UK Retailers such as ASDA.

Is that an alternative route to go about developing Indian Retail? Focus on enabling local corporates to build a strong and vibrant industry?

Regardless of the route chosen, the government can ill afford to sit on a fence dithering about how to manage this industry while consumers are voting through their wallets for the modern formats and chain stores.

Private Label Strategy - Part I

"Indian Management" is a magazine published by the Business Standard group and is the Journal of AIMA. The August 2009 issue featured an article about Private Label Strategy, written by me which I would like to share with all of you.

What is a private label?

Private label products are usually manufactured by a company and sold under the brand of another company. This is a common practice in retail and is also referred to as store brands. Private label portfolios are a powerful margin enhancer for any retailer and most chains promote them aggressively. Such products also deliver several other strategic and tactical benefits to a retailer and are emerging to be a strong factor in any successful retail strategy.

Private label or store brands have two components. One is the product and the other is the brand. The product component is usually benchmarked to an existing one, usually the market leader, in terms of features and benefits. This helps in creating an easy benchmark in the customers mind.

Typically, store brands leverage the branding of the chain and the trust that customers repose in the stores. So, when the customers see a near similar product on the shelf and which has either better features or a lower price, the tendency to pick up that store brand SKU is high. If the product meets the customer expectations, the store brands subsequently substitute the national brands in their shopping baskets.

So, how do retailers get their act together in this regards?

First they define the branding strategy for private label. This is very important because this will not only guide the choice of products but also the features to be included, the packaging, pricing, etc. Typically the retailer adopts an overall private label strategy. The usual strategy used by the majority of retailers is to follow a good; better; best approach.

This strategy clearly defines the portfolio into three segments. The ‘Good’ segment is often the base version or functional products wherein the features are matched but the pricing is significantly competitive. The ‘Better’ segment operates on either better or additional features at similar prices or even lower prices. The ‘Best’ segment is the top end of the portfolio and has a dual role. This segment apart from enhancing the category offering helps to build the overall store imagery as also ensure that the private label portfolio is perceived to be comprehensive and not only cheap products.

Next is the approach to the branding of these products. At a macro level there are two options. One is to use an unrelated brand name for the products and the other is to leverage the store’s name as a prefix followed by a branding which is often a descriptor like Value, Premium, Organic, etc.

Most retailers seem to veer towards the store brand with sub brands for each group as against a generic unrelated name. However, it is not uncommon to see unrelated brand names in certain situations like in the case of Apparels, where customers would prefer some nice names instead of XYZ Cottons. Also, in the Indian context where retailers are experimenting with trying to also distribute the store brands to the trade, have the store name on the product might not work.

Once the overall private label strategy has been finalized and agreed upon, detailed guidelines with regards to the product differentiation, segment classification, packaging guidelines, etc are developed and circulated.

The trading team in the meanwhile would have identified products which would qualify for a private label. This is done basis two main criteria; is there an existing gap in terms of product and/ or price, is the current offering generic and therefore offers an opportunity to create a brand and leverage the first mover advantage. The selected products are then evaluated and the suitable positioning is decided basis the guidelines for each of the segment - good; better; best.